You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 10, October 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Head and Neck Cancer—Specific Quality of Life

Instrument Validation

Jeffrey E. Terrell, MD; Kinjal A. Nanavati, MPH; Ramon M. Esclamado, MD; Julie K. Bishop, CCC-SLP; Carol R. Bradford, MD; Gregory T. Wolf, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(10):1125-1132.


Abstract

Background
The disfigurement and dysfunction associated with head and neck cancer affect emotional well-being and some of the most basic functions of life. Most cancer-specific quality-of-life assessments give a single composite score for head and neck cancer—related quality of life.

Objective
To develop and evaluate an improved multidimensional instrument to assess head and neck cancer—related functional status and well-being.

Methods
The item selection process included literature review, interviews with health care workers, and patient surveys. A survey with 37 disease-specific questions and the SF-12 survey were administered to 253 patients in 3 large medical centers. Factor analysis was performed to identify disease-specific domains. Domain scores were calculated as the standardized score of the component items. These domains were assessed for construct validity based on clinical hypotheses and test-retest reliability.

Results
Four relevant domains were identified: Eating (6 items), Communication (4 items), Pain (4 items), and Emotion (6 items). Each had an internal consistency (Cronbach {alpha} value) of greater than 0.80. Construct validity was demonstrated by moderate correlations with the SF-12 Physical and Mental component scores (r=0.43-0.60). Test-retest reliability for each domain demonstrated strong reliability between the 2 time points. Correlations were strong for each individual question, ranging from 0.53 to 0.93. Construct validity testing demonstrated that the direction of differences for each domain were as hypothesized.

Conclusion
The Head and Neck Quality of Life questionnaire is a promising multidimensional tool with which to assess head and neck cancer—specific quality of life.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:1125-1132



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan (Drs Terrell, Bradford, and Wolf and Ms Bishop), and the Ann Arbor Health Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs (Dr Terrell and Ms Nanavati), Ann Arbor, Mich, and The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Esclamado).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Oropharyngoplasty With Template-Based Reconstruction of Oropharynx Defects
Chepeha et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:887-894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Life Scores Predict Survival Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Karvonen-Gutierrez et al.
JCO 2008;26:2754-2760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Quality of Life Over 1 Year in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Ronis et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:241-248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Depressive Symptoms, Smoking, Drinking, and Quality of Life Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Duffy et al.
Psychosomatics 2007;48:142-148.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgical Oncology
Blazeby et al.
JCO 2006;24:3178-3186.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Life for Patients Following Total Laryngectomy vs Chemoradiation for Laryngeal Preservation
Hanna et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:875-879.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disability in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Taylor et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:764-769.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Terrell et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:401-408.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Life Following Surgery for Anterior Skull Base Tumors
Gil et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:1303-1309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Development and Validation of a Dysphagia-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: The M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory
Chen et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:870-876.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35)
Sherman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:459-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Quality of Life After Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer
Terrell et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:964-971.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.