You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 10, October 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Facial Nerve Function After Parotidectomy

Luc P. Bron, MD; Christopher J. O'Brien, MS, FRACS

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(10):1091-1096.


Abstract

Objectives
To analyze the incidence of facial nerve dysfunction following parotidectomy and to correlate this with the extent of parotid gland resection, the pathological diagnosis, and the clinical setting.

Design
A review of prospectively collected data from a dedicated computerized head and neck database.

Setting
Tertiary care center.

Patients
Between 1987 and 1995, 248 patients underwent 259 parotidectomies performed by the same surgeon (C.J.O'B.). Indications were clinical tumor (n=213) or sialadenitis (n=46). There were 235 previously untreated patients and 13 who had undergone a prior operation on that side. Facial nerve function was normal in 242 patients and abnormal before surgery in 6. Cancers accounted for 88 parotidectomies and benign disease accounted for 171. Of 213 clinical tumors, 41 (19%) were situated deep to the plane of the facial nerve.

Results
The facial nerve was intentionally sacrificed in 28 of 259 operations (18 total and 10 partial sacrifice). In 230 parotidectomies in which facial nerve function was normal before surgery and the nerve was preserved, the incidence of initial postoperative facial weakness was 29%. Based on the diagnosis and extent of surgery, rates of facial weakness were 16.5% and 13%, respectively, for benign and malignant tumors located in the superficial lobe and treated with limited superficial parotidectomy; 30% and 34% for sialadenitis treated with complete superficial parotidectomy and near-total parotidectomy, respectively; 31% and 100%, respectively, for benign and malignant lobe tumors treated with near-total parotidectomy; 83% for parotidectomy associated with a neck dissection; and 33% for patients who had previous parotid surgery. Permanent weakness occurred in 13 (5.6%) of 230 patients, but 10 of these 13 had simultaneous neck dissection and facial nerve dysfunction involved only the marginal mandibular branch. Recovery of normal facial movements occurred within 6 months in 46 (68%) of 67 of those with initial weakness.

Conclusions
The likelihood of temporary facial weakness correlated with the extent of surgery and was especially influenced by tumor location deep to the plane of the facial nerve, previous parotid surgery, a diagnosis of sialadenitis, and the addition of neck dissection to the parotidectomy. Permanent weakness mainly affected the marginal mandibular branch when neck dissection was included.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:1091-1096



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patterns of Drainage and Recurrence Following Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck
Fincher et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:844-848.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Performance of Parotidectomy in Nonspecialist Centers
Umapathy et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:925-928.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.