You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 7, July 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Endoscopic vs External Drainage of Orbital Subperiosteal Abscess

Edwin L. Page, MD; Brian J. Wiatrak, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(7):737-740.


Abstract

Periorbital cellulitis is frequently limited to the preseptal region. However, there may be associated postseptal inflammation and orbital subperiosteal abscess (SPA). Surgical management of orbital SPA includes open drainage through an external ethmoidectomy approach, although recently the use of endoscopic techniques has been reported. This study was undertaken to evaluate postseptal cellulitis and orbital SPA in patients with periorbital cellulitis and to assess the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic management of orbital SPA. From 1989 through 1994, 158 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of periorbital cellulitis. Nineteen of these patients were diagnosed with postseptal orbital inflammation, and 14 underwent surgical drainage via an external approach, an endoscopic approach, or a combination of both. Issues addressed include (1) the role of sinus disease as the cause of periorbital cellulitis; (2) the role of computed tomographic scanning; (3) the effectiveness of aggressive medical therapy; and (4) the results of endoscopic drainage of orbital SPA compared with the external approach.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:737-740



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Pediatric Otolaryngology, The Children's Hospital of Alabama, Birmingham.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cosmetic Considerations in Surgery for Orbital Subperiosteal Abscess in Children: Experience With a Combined Transcaruncular and Transnasal Endoscopic Approach
Pelton et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:652-655.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.