You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 6, June 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Wide Polytef (Gore-Tex) Implants in Lip Augmentation and Nasolabial Groove Correction

Krzysztof Conrad, MD, FRCS, FRCSC; Michael Rainey MacDonald, MD, FRCS

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(6):664-670.


Abstract

Objective
To describe a new technique of polytef (Gore-Tex) implantation into the upper and lower lips and nasolabial grooves by using large implants as a method that achieves effective cosmetic improvement.

Setting
A private cosmetic surgery center.

Participants
Thirty-three (female) patients who desired fuller lips and 62 patients (52 female and 10 male) who requested less prominent cheek lip grooves.

Main Outcome Measure
Significant patient satisfaction after 12 to 54 months.

Results
Conspicuous aesthetic effect that related to both lip and nasolabial groove correction was documented. All patients but 4 (2 in each group) were pleased with the final outcome of the treatment.

Conclusions
In the opinion of the authors, the threading technique of polytef implantation creates inconspicuous improvement—both in lip augmentation and nasolabial groove correction. Large polytef implants that were inserted through a tunneling technique produced consistently good results. Implants (lip augmentation: width, ≤10 mm, and thickness, 4 mm; nasolabial groove correction: width, 8 mm, and thickness, ≤8 mm) were found to be safe, simple, and effective.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:664-670)



Author Affiliations

From the Cosmetic Facial Surgery Service, Department of Otolaryngology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto (Ontario).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient Satisfaction With Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Softform) Implants to the Perioral Region
Wall et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:320-324.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acellular Dermis for Facial Soft Tissue Augmentation: Preliminary Report
Costantino et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:38-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) Augmentation of Deep Nasolabial Creases
Robertson and Dyer II
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:456-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.