You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 6, June 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Preservation of the Eye in the Treatment of Sinonasal Malignant Neoplasms With Orbital Involvement

A Confirmation of the Original Treatise

W. Scott McCary, MD; Paul A. Levine, MD; Robert W. Cantrell, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(6):657-659.


Abstract

Objective
To continue the retrospective analysis reported in 1988 that supported preservation of the eye in the treatment of sinonasal cancers when bony erosion of the orbit was noted on pretreatment radiographic analysis.

Design
Using the eye-sparing protocol previously reported, which included preoperative radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy, depending on tumor size, involvement, or other characteristic) for malignant neoplasms of the superior nasal vault that had eroded the bony orbit, retrospective analysis of the results of therapy for the additional 33 patients treated between 1986 and 1993 was performed. These data were added to those from the original series to provide a total of 74 patients. Forty-one patients (55%) showed bony erosion at initial evaluation and 14 (19%) had periorbital involvement. During surgery, the periorbita was evaluated by frozen section control. If tumor was found, that region of periorbita was resected and, if necessary, replaced with fascia or split-thickness graft.

Results
Five patients from the original series had orbital sacrifice. Of the remaining 36 patients, 4 (11%) had recurrent disease involving the orbit, but not at the primary site. Twenty (55%) of the 36 patients had no orbital complications, and only 1 (3%) had a permanent motility disturbance and 4 (13%) developed cataracts after radiotherapy.

Conclusion
With the use of preoperative radiotherapy in resection of involved periorbita with frozen section control in tumors of the sinonasal vault that involve the bony orbit, the eye can be spared in most instances without compromising oncologic safety.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:657-659)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Sparing the Eye in Craniofacial Surgery for Superior Nasal Vault Malignant Neoplasms: Analysis of Benefit
Essig et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:406-411.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Esthesioneuroblastoma: Continued Follow-up of a Single Institution's Experience.
Loy et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:134-138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.