You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 5, May 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quality of Life and Functional Status Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Linda L. D'Antonio, PhD; Grenith J. Zimmerman, PhD; David F. Cella, PhD; Steven A. Long, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(5):482-487.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the relationship among three validated head and neck—specific measures of functional status and a general measure of quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer.

Design
Cross-sectional study using medical chart review, patient interview, and test administration.

Setting
Academic tertiary referral center.

Participants
Fifty adult patients 3 months to 6 years after major surgery for head and neck cancer.

Main Outcome Measure
Scores from a general measure of quality of life (the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy), a subscale specific to head and neck cancer, the University of Washington Quality of Life

Questionnaire, and the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Results
The disease-specific measures of functional status correlate well with one another. However, there were low correlations between the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy and the disease-specific measures, indicating that general and disease-specific instruments contribute unique information about quality of life.

Conclusion
A general measure of quality of life augments information obtained by disease-specific instruments by interpreting functional status in the broader scope of the patient's life.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:482-487)



Author Affiliations

From the School of Medicine and Cancer Institute (Dr D'Antonio), School of Allied Health (Dr Zimmerman), and Medical Center (Dr Long), Loma Linda (Calif) University; and Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (Dr Cella).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Outcome Measures in Facial Plastic Surgery: Patient-Reported and Clinical Efficacy Measures
Rhee and McMullin
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:194-207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Phase II Cancer Clinical Trials: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
Wagner et al.
JCO 2007;25:5058-5062.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality-of-Life Assessment After Supradose Selective Intra-arterial Cisplatin and Concomitant Radiation (RADPLAT) for Inoperable Stage IV Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Ackerstaff et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1185-1190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35)
Sherman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:459-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.