You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 5, May 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Posterolateral Neck Dissection

Technique and Results

Eduardo M. Diaz, Jr, MD; John R. Austin, MD; Luke I. Burke, MD; Helmuth Goepfert, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(5):477-480.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness of the posterolateral neck dissection in providing regional control of metastatic disease to the posterior triangle from head and neck primary tumors as part of a multidisciplinary treatment approach.

Design
A case series review of 55 patients treated over a 10-year period from 1982 through 1991 with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Factors evaluated included site and histologic type of primary tumors, extent of surgery performed, other therapies provided, pathologic findings, and clinical outcome.

Setting
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Patients
Forty-six male and nine female patients were studied. Three of them had bilateral dissections, for a total of 58 operations. Thirty-five were diagnosed as having melanoma; 10, squamous cell carcinoma; and 10, various other histologic types.

Intervention
All patients underwent a posterolateral neck dissection, either alone or as part of a multidisciplinary treatment plan.

Outcome Measures
Factors reviewed were recurrence, either at the primary site or at a regional site, development of distant metastases, and surgical morbidity.

Results
Our review showed that, overall, disease was controlled at the site of the primary tumor in 89% of patients (94% of patients with melanoma) and that regional disease was controlled in 93% of patients (89% of patients with melanoma). Surgical morbidity was minimal.

Conclusion
The "functional" posterolateral neck dissection as practiced at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center is effective surgical therapy that provides control of regional metastatic disease to the posterior neck from head and neck primary tumors.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:477-480)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.