You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 3, March 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Effects of Loratadine and Terfenadine on the Induced Nasal Allergic Reaction

Fuad M. Baroody, MD; Margaret C. Lim, MD; David Proud, PhD; Anne Kagey-Sobotka, PhD; Lawrence M. Lichtenstein, MD, PhD; Robert M. Naclerio, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(3):309-316.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the effect of terfenadine and loratadine on the early nasal allergic response to challenge and the subsequent cellular influx and hyperresponsiveness.

Design
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, triple-crossover study.

Subjects
Fourteen, asymptomatic, allergic volunteers.

Interventions
After an initial challenge with methacholine chloride, subjects received treatment with placebo, loratadine (10 mg by mouth daily), or terfenadine (60 mg by mouth twice daily) for 1 week, followed by a nasal allergen challenge with lavages; 24 hours later, while the subjects were still receiving medication, the quantity of cells in the nasal lavage was determined, and another challenge with methacholine was done. Mediator levels were quantified in nasal lavages after the allergen challenge, and the weight of the methacholine-induced nasal secretions was measured.

Results
Both loratadine and terfenadine treatment resulted in significant reductions in allergen-induced sneezing and the levels of histamine, kinins, albumin, and N-{alpha}-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester–esterase activity in recovered nasal lavages compared with the reductions that resulted from placebo treatment, with no significant difference among the treatments. Treatment had no effect on the levels of tryptase, prostaglandin D2, or leukotriene C4. A significant eosinophil influx into nasal secretions 24 hours after the allergen challenge in patients who were receiving placebo (P=.006) was not affected by loratadine or terfenadine treatment. Comparing methacholine-induced secretions between screening challenges and challenges with the patients who were being treated with either loratadine or terfenadine, there was a significant decrease in secretions after the use of these antihistamines (P<.05).

Conclusion
Both loratadine and terfenadine partially inhibit the early nasal response to allergen challenge and the subsequent reactivity to a challenge with methacholine without affecting the influx of eosinophils into nasal secretions.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:309-316)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. Drs Baroody and Naclerio are now with the Section of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago (Ill).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Superiority of an Intranasal Corticosteroid Compared With an Oral Antihistamine in the As-Needed Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Kaszuba et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2581-2587.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.