You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 11, November 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Port-wine Stains

An Assessment of 5 Years of Treatment

Steven S. Orten, MD; Milton Waner, MD, FCS(SA); Stephen Flock, PhD; Paula K. Roberson, PhD; Jay Kincannon, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(11):1174-1179.


Abstract

Objective
To assess objectively the results of flashlamp-pumped dye laser treatment of port-wine stains (PWS).

Design
Pretreatment and posttreatment photographs were compared with the appearance of the lesion at follow-up examination. Clinical response was determined by assigning a percentage of lesional lightening score by 2 physicians and the patient, and by reflectance spectrophotometric measurements.

Setting
University and university-affiliated health center.

Patients
One hundred two patients (118 PWS) aged 1 month to 66 years (mean, 20 years; median, 16 years) treated from July 1, 1989, to June 30, 1994.

Results
Eighteen (15.3%) of the 118 PWS had more than 90% lesional lightening (complete or almost complete response), 77 (65.3%) had lightening from 50% to 90% (good response), 21 (17.8%) had lightening from 11% to 49% (poor response), and 2 (1.7%) had lightening less than 10% (no response). Clinical response did not vary among age groups, but showed statistically significant differences between anatomical locations. A return of PWS after initial response was observed in patients who were seen more than 1 year following completion of treatment.

Conclusions
Treatment of PWS by flashlamp-pumped dye laser results in a good to complete response in most patients. Anatomical location of the lesion is a valuable prognostic indicator of response to treatment. The initially impressive results of flashlamp-pumped dye laser treatment of PWS may be tempered by the gradual return of the vascular lesion as time elapses after completion of therapy. Our experience indicates that PWS show a tendency to recur at a rate approaching 50% between 3 and 4 years after completion of treatment.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:1174-1179



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Orten, Waner, Flock, and Roberson) and Dermatology (Dr Kincannon), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Redarkening of Port-Wine Stains 10 Years after Pulsed-Dye-Laser Treatment
Huikeshoven et al.
NEJM 2007;356:1235-1240.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Cryogen Spray Cooling and High Radiant Exposures on Selective Vascular Injury During Laser Irradiation of Human Skin
Tunnell et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:743-750.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recent developments in lasers and the treatment of birthmarks
Waner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2003;88:372-374.
FULL TEXT  

Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Johns and Niparko
JAMA 1997;277:1886-1887.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.