You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Microtia Grade as an Indicator of Middle Ear Development in Aural Atresia

Stilianos E. Kountakis, MD; Emmanuel Helidonis, MD; Robert A. Jahrsdoerfer, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(8):885-886.


Abstract

Objective
To correlate the appearance of the external ear with the development of the middle ear in patients with congenital aural atresia.

Design
Retrospective analysis of patients with congenital aural atresia. Obtain the microtia grades assigned to affected ears and correlate them with atresia scores that describe the degree of the middle ear malformation.

Setting
University of Texas—Houston Otolaryngology Clinic (1988 to 1992).

Patients
A total of 199 ears with congenital microtia and aural atresia and 25 ears with canal stenosis without microtia were identified, all of which had been previously evaluated by high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone, and then assigned an atresia score. Patients with Treacher Collins syndrome were not included in our study.

Results
The average atresia score in cases with grade I microtia was 8.5; grade II microtia, 7.2; and grade III microtia, 5.9. In cases with canal stenosis without microtia, the average atresia score was 8.3.

Conclusion
The better developed the external ear, the better developed the middle ear.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:885-886)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas—Houston Medical School (Drs Kountakis and Jahrsdoerfer), and the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Crete (Greece) Medical School (Dr Helidonis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Genetics of microtia and associated syndromes
Alasti and Van Camp
J. Med. Genet. 2009;46:361-369.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Jahrsdoerfer Grading Scale in Surgery to Repair Congenital Aural Atresia
Shonka et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:873-877.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correlation Between Microtia and Temporal Bone Malformation Evaluated Using Grading Systems
Ishimoto et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:326-329.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of the External Auditory Canal in the Development of the Malleal Manubrium in Humans
Ishimoto et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:913-916.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.