You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 4, April 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Notes
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cochlear Implantation in a Patient After Removal of an Acoustic Neuroma

The Implications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gadolinium on Patient Management

Gregory F. Hulka, MD; Estrada J. Bernard, MD; Harold C. Pillsbury, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(4):465-468.


Abstract

The advent of magnetic resonance imaging has allowed otologists to focus on the early removal of acoustic neuromas with the goal of hearing preservation. Clearly, there are some unpredictable factors, such as placement of the tumor in the medial vs the lateral segment of the internal auditory canal and the capricious nature of the blood supply to these benign neoplasms, that make prediction of hearing preservation difficult. Nonetheless, the present goal of surgery for removal of acoustic tumors has changed its focus from preservation of the facial nerve alone to preservation of the facial nerve and preservation of hearing. In a patient with an only-hearing ear and a small acoustic neuroma, there is some controversy concerning whether the tumor should be removed early, with the goal of hearing preservation, or if the patient should be allowed to progress to a considerable hearing loss in an effort to preserve natural hearing as long as possible. We report a case in which an acoustic tumor was removed from an only-hearing ear in a patient with neurofibromatosis after hearing loss had progressed in that ear but before the development of total deafness. Postoperatively, the patient successfully underwent cochlear implantation. We also discuss decisions that we made during the surgical procedure, as well as the feasibility of cochlear implantation in patients with profound deafness after the excision of acoustic neuromas.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:465-468)



Author Affiliations

From the Divisions of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Hulka and Pillsbury) and Neurosurgery (Dr Bernard), School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cochlear Implantation in a Patient After Removal of an Acoustic Neuroma
Luetje
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:205-205.
ABSTRACT  

Cochlear Implantation in a Patient After Removal of an Acoustic Neuroma-Reply
Pillsbury
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:205-205.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.