You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 4, April 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

An Outcomes Study of Cochlear Implants in Deaf Patients

Audiologic, Economic, and Quality-of-Life Changes

Jeffrey P. Harris, MD, PhD; John P. Anderson, PhD; Robert Novak, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(4):398-404.


Abstract

Objectives
To investigate and quantitate the changes in economic, emotional, and health-related quality of life after cochlear implantation.

Subjects
Nine patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years who qualified for surgery.

Methods
Patients underwent assessment using four socioeconomic indicator scales administered preoperatively, and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 30 months, and 3 years postoperatively. All patients continued to use their cochlear implants during the 3-year follow-up period.

Results
Uniform and systematic improvement in quality of life and psychologic well-being, and a steady increase in mean personal income for the group that underwent implantation, supporting the contention that cochlear implantation is a beneficial surgical procedure for profoundly deaf patients.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:398-404)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery (Dr Harris), and the Division of Health Care Sciences, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine (Dr Anderson), School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego; and the Department of Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University (Dr Novak).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health-Related Quality of Life and Hearing Aids: A Tutorial
Abrams et al.
TRENDS AMPLIF 2005;9:99-109.
ABSTRACT  

A Cost-Utility Scenario Analysis of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
Summerfield et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1255-1262.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Utility of the Cochlear Implant in Adults: A Meta-analysis
Cheng and Niparko
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:1214-1218.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Prospective Study of the Cost-Utility of the Multichannel Cochlear Implant
Palmer et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:1221-1228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Richtsmeier and Johns
JAMA 1996;275:1838-1839.
ABSTRACT  

Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery
Niparko and Johns
JAMA 1995;273:1705-1706.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.