You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cost Analysis of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Clean Head and Neck Surgery

Elizabeth A. Blair, MD; Jonas T. Johnson, MD; Robin L. Wagner; Ricardo L. Carrau, MD; John G. Bizakis, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(3):269-271.


Abstract

Objective
This study was undertaken to assess the excess cost of hospitalization accrued to patients who develop postoperative wound infection following neck dissection in which the wound was not exposed to secretions from the upper aerodigestive tract.

Design
A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent "clean" neck dissection from 1976 to 1989 were evaluated. Antibiotic administration (yes or no), postoperative wound infection (yes or no), and duration and cost of hospitalization were assessed.

Setting
All surgeries were performed in a university medical center.

Patients
All patients underwent neck dissection in which the procedure was clean, ie, there was no exposure to secretions from the upper aerodigestive tract.

Main Outcome Measures
Patients were assessed to determine administration of antibiotics (yes or no), development of postoperative wound infection (yes or no), and duration and cost of hospitalization.

Results
Wound infection developed in 10 (10%) of 99 patients who did not receive antibiotics. Of 93 patients who received perioperative antibiotics, three (3.3%) developed wound infection. This difference was not statistically significant. The type II (β) error was greater than 0.2, suggesting that a significant difference may have been missed (false-negative) as a result of the small number of patients studied. The excess cost accrued to each patient who developed a postoperative wound infection was in excess of $36 000 (1992 dollars). The cost of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis to 100 patients is less than this amount.

Conclusion
The decision to withhold antibiotic prophylaxis should not be made in an effort to reduce hospital costs.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:269-271)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh (Pa) School of Medicine (Drs Blair, Johnson, and Carrau and Ms Wagner), and University Hospital of Crete (Greece) (Dr Bizakis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Development and Implementation of a Clinical Pathway for Patients Undergoing Total Laryngectomy: Impact on Cost and Quality of Care
Hanna et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:1247-1251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.