You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 2, February 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

T3 Glottic Carcinoma Revisited

Transglottic vs Pure Glottic Carcinoma

Sheng-Po Hao, MD; Eugene N. Myers, MD; Jonas T. Johnson, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(2):166-170.


Abstract

Objective
To compare results of treatment of patients who have T3 transglottic carcinoma with patients who have T3 pure glottic carcinoma.

Design
A retrospective cohort study from January 1976 to December 1990 with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Setting:
Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Patients
The medical records of 161 patients with T3 glottic carcinoma were reviewed. We excluded 17 patients who were unavailable for follow-up or who had died of other causes but were free of glottic carcinoma. Therefore, 144 patients were entered into this study—79 patients with transglottic carcinoma and 65 with pure glottic carcinoma.

Intervention
Three treatment groups consisted of the following: 30 patients in whom a full course of radiation therapy failed and who subsequently underwent salvage surgery; 92 patients who underwent surgery only; and 22 patients who underwent surgery and had postoperative radiation therapy. Seventy-five patients had total laryngectomy, and 69 had total laryngectomy with neck dissection.

Main Outcome Measures
Cervical metastasis, extracapsular spread, local failure, stomal recurrence, distant metastasis, and 2 years with no evidence of disease.

Results
Patients with T3 transglottic carcinoma had a higher incidence of occult cervical metastasis (12% vs 9%), overall cervical metastasis (27% vs 17%), and extracapsular spread (43% vs 27%) than did patients with T3 pure glottic carcinoma. Two years of no disease was similar in these two groups (80% vs 79%). Extracapsular spread had a notable effect on distant metastasis and on 2 years of no disease.

Conclusion
Patients with T3 transglottic carcinoma had a higher incidence of cervical metastasis and extracapsular spread than patients with T3 pure glottic carcinoma. Every patient with T3 transglottic carcinoma should be treated with total laryngectomy with neck dissection.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:166-170)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh (Pa) School of Medicine.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Paraglottic Space in Supracricoid Laryngectomy
Kim et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:304-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.