You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 9, September 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Development of Thrombosis Models in the Rabbit

David W. Stepnick, MD; Richard E. Hayden, MD; Norman D. Hogikyan, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(9):997-1002.


Abstract

Objective
In an effort to decrease the probability of thrombosis at microvascular anastomotic sites, researchers have examined techniques for decreasing the probability of thrombus formation at these sites. Identification of an appropriate animal model that is relatively easy to perform, reliable, and reproducible was attempted in this study. The goal of this study is to provide other investigators with a comparison and critical appraisal of various thrombosis models allowing a more directed selection of models for their own research.

Design
A prospective, nonblinded animal study was designed that compared features of thrombosis models previously described in the literature with each other and with a new model (the "tuck" model), herein described.

Main Outcome Measures
Ease of dissection, time to thrombosis, and other technical details were recorded. Additionally, validation of clot histologic features in the tuck model was performed.

Results
The inversion graft models were found to be the most highly predictable and reliably thrombogenic, although technically quite difficult. The tuck model produces clot analogous to that produced clinically and is easy to perform, although a predictable number of vessels will not thrombose.

Conclusions
The results of this study comparing various animal models of anastomotic thrombosis suggests that the tuck model is the model of choice for most thrombus prevention studies. When predictability of thrombosis is a critical factor, the inversion graft model should be chosen.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:997-1002)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Stepnick), and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Dr Hayden); and Washington University, St Louis, Mo (Dr Hogikyan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effect of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin on Microvenous Thrombosis in a Rat Model
Emerick and Deschler
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:19-21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clopidogrel Use for Reducing the Rate of Thrombosis in a Rat Model of Microarterial Anastomosis
Nayak and Deschler
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:800-803.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Subcutaneously Administered Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin on Microarterial Thrombosis in the Rat
Hadlock et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:36-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.