You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 9, September 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Simultaneous Interstitial Radiotherapy With Regional or Free-Flap Reconstruction, Following Salvage Surgery of Recurrent Head and Neck Carcinoma

Analysis of Complications

Juan F. Moscoso, MD; Mark L. Urken, MD; Jack Dalton, MD; Michael F. Wesson, MD; Hugh F. Biller, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(9):965-972.


Abstract

Objective
Reports on complications following brachytherapy offer conflicting views on the benefit of locoregional flap coverage of the implanted tumor bed. This study reviews complications following pedicled and free-flap coverage of brachytherapy sources after salvage surgery for recurrent head and neck carcinoma.

Design
Retrospective chart review.

Setting
Academic tertiary referral center.

Participants
Fifteen patients with advanced, radiorecurrent carcinomas of the head and neck, treated between 1988 and 1992.

Intervention
All patients underwent surgical resection and implantation of the tumor bed with iridium 192 after-loading catheters (13 patients) or iodine 125 seeds (two patients). The average dose of interstitial radiotherapy supplied was 50.24 ±45.19 Gy (mean± SD). Coverage of the implanted tumor bed was achieved with regional myocutaneous flaps in 10 patients and microvascular free flaps in five patients.

Outcome Measure
All wound and healing complications were identified. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months.

Results
No significant complications were encountered. No flap, pedicled or free, demonstrated any degree of necrosis. Four minor complications developed in the group of patients who underwent reconstruction with pedicled myocutaneous flaps. One orocutaneous fistula developed in a patient in whom a radial forearm was used to reconstruct a posterior pharyngeal wall defect.

Conclusions
An expectation of increased postoperative morbidity should not interfere with the decision to proceed with multimodality salvage therapy of patients with advanced, recurrent head and neck tumors. The advantages of free tissue transfer in the reconstruction of head and neck defects are not compromised when the flaps are simultaneously utilized to provide coverage for brachytherapy sites.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:965-972)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Moscoso, Urken, and Biller) and Radiation Oncology (Drs Dalton and Wesson), Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.