You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 8, August 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Problems With Tracheoesophageal Fistula Voice Restoration in Totally Laryngectomized Patients

A Review of 95 Cases

Krzysztof Izdebski, FK, MA, PhD, CCC; Charles G. Reed, PhD, CCC; Joel C. Ross, MD; Raymond L. Hilsinger, Jr, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(8):840-845.


Abstract

Objectives
Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) construction, performed during or after total laryngectomy, is used for voice and speech restoration but has been associated with mild to severe complications. Our goal was to study the successes and complications in the application of this technique to restore voice function after laryngectomy in 95 consecutive patients.

Research Design
Retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up time of 3.5 years.

Setting
Five medical facilities in northern California: the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in San Francisco and Martinez, the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Oakland, and private practice offices in San Francisco and Pinole.

Patients
Ninety-five patients (90 men and five women) who had undergone total laryngectomy with subsequent or primary TEF construction. Patients' ages ranged from 35 to 80 years.

Interventions
Three- or two-layer closure was used, depending on whether TEF construction was done as a secondary or a primary procedure. Most patients underwent radiation therapy, and most used surface or intraoral electrolarynx devices before TEF construction. Insufflation tests were performed by clinicians, or self-insufflation tests were performed by the patient. Patients' voices were recorded and analyzed. In many cases, respiratory and pulmonary function studies were performed before and after total laryngectomy or TEF. Blom-Singer and Groningen voice prostheses were used.

Main Outcome Measures
Voice restoration was considered successful when the patient was able to communicate effectively via the TEF.

Results
Approximately 92% of patients who underwent TEF construction and had voice prostheses placed were considered to be successfully rehabilitated. Complications ranged from mild to severe and included problems with predictive values obtained during insufflation, fistula retention, TEF angulation shifts, fungal colonization of the prosthesis, valve retention problems, difficulty with digital occlusion, pressure necrosis, postradiation necrosis, dysphagia, phonatory gagging, emesis, gastric distention, pouching, stenosis, infection, hypertrophy, shunt insufficiency, persistent spasm, myotomy, inadvertent fistula closure, and aspiration of the prosthesis.

Conclusions
Acoustic measures indicate that speech produced with the TEF compares better with normal laryngeal speech than does esophageal or electronic speech. Thus, TEF should remain the preferred procedure to rehabilitate patients undergoing total laryngectomy.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:840-845)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California–Davis (Dr Izdebski), and the Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Reed), San Francisco, Calif; and the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Oakland, Calif (Dr Hilsinger). Dr Ross is in private practice in Pinole, Calif.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Some Comments on the Escalation of Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Dimensions
Blom
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:500-502.
FULL TEXT  

Downsizing of Voice Prosthesis Diameter in Patients With Laryngectomy: An In Vitro Study
Eerenstein et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:838-841.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Long-term Indwelling Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis for Alaryngeal Voice Rehabilitation
Graville et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:288-292.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early Speech Results With the Provox Prosthesis After Laryngectomy
Aust and McCaffrey
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:966-968.
ABSTRACT  

An Unusual Metastasis to the Thumb in a Laryngectomized Tracheoesophageal Speaker
Lewin et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:1007-1009.
ABSTRACT  

Assessment of Tracheoesophageal Speech in a Tonal Language: A Prospective Study
Wong et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:88-92.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.