You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 7, July 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of Decision Analysis in Planning a Management Strategy for the Stage NO Neck

Michael H. Weiss, MD; Louis B. Harrison, MD; Richard S Isaacs, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(7):699-702.


Abstract

Objective
There are three major strategies in the treatment of patients with a stage NO neck with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: elective neck dissection, elective neck irradiation, and observation. Each has appropriate salvage strategies in the event of local recurrence. We used decision analysis to determine the optimal strategy for neck treatment as a function of the probability of occult cervical metastasis.

Data Sources
We used the bibliographies of current articles and books to access clinical studies of patients with stage NO neck cancer.

Study Selection
Studies that included large numbers of patients and contained a minimum 2-year follow-up, with results analyzed in terms of outcome as a function of stage of neck disease, were included.

Data Extraction
Specific data points were extracted from the studies independently by multiple observers, and mean values were used in the decision analysis.

Data Synthesis
A decision tree was constructed with use of a computer model to compare the three management strategies. Probabilities of each of the possible events depicted in the trees were inserted into the tree structure. These probabilities were gleaned from the literature as described above. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the optimal threshold for treatment of the neck.

Conclusion
A patient with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and stage NO neck status should be observed if the probability of occult cervical metastasis is less than 20%. If the probability is greater than 20%, treatment of the neck is warranted. The treatment plan should ideally involve a single modality of therapy; both neck dissection and radiation therapy are quite efficacious in the clinical context, and the decision of which one to employ should be driven by the treatment of the primary lesion. Decision analysis is useful in complex clinical situations.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:699-702)



Author Affiliations

From The Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery (Dr Weiss), and the Department of Radiation Oncology (Dr Harrison), Memorial—Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Otolaryngology, Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital (Drs Weiss and Isaacs), New York, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Evaluate Cervical Node Metastases in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis
Kyzas et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:712-720.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tumor Thickness and Paralingual Distance of Coronal MR Imaging Predicts Cervical Node Metastases in Oral Tongue Carcinoma
Okura et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008;29:45-50.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective Study of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Palpably Negative Neck
Ng et al.
JCO 2006;24:4371-4376.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

18F-FDG PET/CT for Detecting Nodal Metastases in Patients with Oral Cancer Staged N0 by Clinical Examination and CT/MRI
Schoder et al.
JNM 2006;47:755-762.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is neck ultrasound necessary for early stage oral tongue carcinoma with clinically N0 neck?
To et al.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:156-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neck Dissection: An Operation in Evolution: Hayes Martin Lecture
Myers and Gastman
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:14-25.
FULL TEXT  

Elective Management of the Clinically Negative Neck by Otolaryngologists in Patients With Oral Tongue Cancer
Werning et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:83-88.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for the Assessment of Cervical Metastases
Knappe et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:1091-1096.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Clinical Criteria Alone in the Management of the Clinically Negative Neck Among Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx
O'Brien et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:360-365.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcome of Observing the N0 Neck Using Ultrasonographic-Guided Cytology for Follow-up
van den Brekel et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:153-156.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selective Neck Dissection of Anatomically Appropriate Levels Is as Efficacious as Modified Radical Neck Dissection for Elective Treatment of the Clinically Negative Neck in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Respiratory and Digestive Tracts
Clayman and Frank
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:348-353.
FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of Histologic Findings in Neck Dissections for Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Pinsolle et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:145-148.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.