You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 3, March 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Sponge-Gel–Supported Histoculture Drug-Response Assay for Head and Neck Cancer

Correlations With Clinical Response to Cisplatin

K. Thomas Robbins, MD; Kenneth M. Connors; Anna Maria Storniolo, MD; Catherine Hanchett; Robert M. Hoffman, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(3):288-292.


Abstract

Objective
Sponge-gel–supported histoculture drug-response assay (SSHDRA) represents a promising method to determine chemosensitivity of solid tumors. To determine whether the assay correlates clinically, we compared the in vivo and in vitro effects of cisplatin in 23 of 26 patients with head and neck cancers.

Design
The criterion for in vitro sensitivity to cisplatin was an 84% or greater inhibition by cisplatin of the number of tritiated thymidine–incorporating cells of the histocultured tumors compared with untreated control culture preparations, as measured by means of histologic autoradiography. Comparisons were made with clinical responses, ie, complete response, partial response, or no response.

Patients
The study was carried out in patients with head and neck cancers and comprised 21 patients with squamous-cell carcinoma, three patients with other carcinomas, and two patients with sarcoma.

Results
Ten of 12 patients with in vitro–sensitive tumors had either complete or partial response clinically. The overall accuracy of the SSHDRA was 74% in this correlative clinical trial; the predictive-positive value was 83%, the sensitivity was 71%, and the specificity was 78%. Seven of 11 patients with in vitro–resistant tumors demonstrated no response for a predictive-negative value of 64%.

Conclusions
We conclude that the SSHDRA shows a high correlation for tumors that demonstrate both in vivo drug resistance and sensitivity. The in vitro–like maintenance of three-dimensional tissue architecture of the tumors in histoculture probably contributes to high clinical predictivity of drug response of the SSHDRA. The data support further comparisons to determine the clinical usefulness of the SSHDRA for identifying complete and partial responders to chemotherapy.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:288-292)



Author Affiliations

From the Divisions of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Robbins and Ms Hanchett) and Hematology-Oncology (Dr Storniolo), University of California Medical Center; AntiCancer Inc (Mr Connors and Dr Hoffman), San Diego; and Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, Calif (Dr Hoffman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.