You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 3, March 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Floor of the Mouth Cancer

David A. Cole, MD; Pushpa M. Patel, MD; Jacqueline R. Matar, MD; Daniel E. Kenady, MD; Yosh Maruyama, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(3):260-263.


Abstract

One hundred eighty-three patients with floor of the mouth cancer, of whom 162 were evaluable, were treated between 1962 and 1987. Most patients (139) received treatment with curative intent. Forty-seven received surgery only; 45 received radiotherapy (RT) only; 23 received preoperative RT and surgery; 24 received surgery and postoperative RT. A subset of 30 patients received brachytherapy and external beam RT. Overall survival rates were: surgery only, 90%/68% (2 years/5 years); RT only, 65%/45%; preoperative RT, 65%/43%; and postoperative RT, 78%/41%. Patients receiving surgery generally had lower stage disease and good performance status; RT patients generally had higher stage disease—(64% had stages III and IV disease). Patients receiving RT also had over twice the incidence of deaths from intercurrent disease. These were the contributing factors to the lower survival rate of the patients receiving RT. Disease-free survivals were similar between the groups. In contrast, locoregional control was better for patients receiving RT, particularly in the postoperative RT and brachytherapy groups. Locoregional control rates were: surgery only, 59%/52% (2 years/5 years); RT only, 78%/69%; preoperative RT, 75%/58%; postoperative RT, 80%/74%; and brachytherapy, 96%/89%. This advantage in locoregional control was marked in patients with advanced local disease and was evident at 2 years and beyond. Treatment approaches evolved during the study period toward the use of surgery only in lower stages and combined with RT (usually postoperative) in higher stages.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:260-263)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Radiation Medicine (Drs Cole, Patel, Matar, and Maruyama) and Surgery (Dr Kenady), University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.