You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 2, February 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Preauricular Portion of the Rhytidectomy Incision

Ferdinand F. Becker, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(2):166-171.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the best placement of the preauricular portion of the rhytidectomy incision in the female patient from the aesthetic point of view.

Design
Blind, randomized review of close-up photographs of the ear area in 36 patients after rhytidectomy.

Setting
Office surgical suite, accredited by Accreditation Association of Ambulatory Health Care.

Participants
Two facial plastic surgeons and two plastic surgeons, all skilled rhytidectomy surgeons.

Interventions
None.

Main Outcome Measures
Participants received close-up photographs of the ear area of 36 patients at least 6 months after rhytidectomy. Eighteen patients had posterior tragal edge incisions and 18 patients had pretragal incisions. Cases were randomized. Participants were asked to rate the preauricular portion of the rhytidectomy incisions overall as to aesthetic results. The categories were excellent, good, average, acceptable, and poor.

Results
Results of surveys were collated. Three categories of results were determined: best, acceptable, and poorest. Posterior tragal edge incisions scored higher than pretragal incisions. Those incisions that scored in the best category tended to have a normal contour of the tragus and normal pretragal sulcus. Incisions that scored in the poorest category tended to have a flat posttragal edge with obliteration of the pretragal sulcus.

Conclusions
The incision at the posterior edge of the tragus is preferred over the pretragal incision for female rhytidectomy patients except those with a large, prominent or angulated tragus.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:166-171)



Author Affiliations

From the Facial Plastic Surgery Center, Vero Beach, Fla, and Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Techniques for Creating Inconspicuous Face-lift Scars: Avoiding Visible Incisions and Loss of Temporal Hair
Kridel and Liu
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:325-333.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Alar Reductions in Rhinoplasty
Gilbert
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:781-784.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.