You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 10, October 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Electric Auditory Brain-Stem Responses in Nucleus Multichannel Cochlear Implant Users

Annelle V. Hodges, PhD; Roger A. Ruth, PhD; Paul R. Lambert, MD; Thomas J. Balkany, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(10):1093-1099.


Abstract

Objective
The electrically elicited auditory brainstem response (EABR) has been proposed as a tool for use in cochlear implant device setting. To systematically examine the relationships of psychophysical perceptions and EABRs, implant users underwent a series of comparative measurements. The characteristics of the EABR were assessed for their predictive value in determining the subjective measures needed to set the implant device.

Design
Characteristics of the EABR and various perceptual measures in a group of cochlear implant users served as compared variables in a correlational study.

Setting
The study was carried out in the audiology clinic of a university hospital. The audiology clinic maintained a fully equipped evoked potential laboratory, and was part of an otolaryngology department that supported a cochlear implant program.

Subjects
The subjects consisted of 10 consecutively selected postlinguistically deafened adult multichannel cochlear implant users.

Main Outcome Measures
Morphology, latency, and amplitude measures of the EABR recordings were compared with behavioral perceptions of threshold, most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels.

Results
Perceptual measures of threshold were found to be significantly related to the threshold of the EABR across subjects and electrode position. Simple linear regression analysis was used to measure the degree of the relationship. An r value of 0.89 attests to a significant relationship. The EABR wave latencies and amplitudes were found to have no significant relationship to any of the perceptual measures examined.

Conclusions
Although EABR cannot replace behavioral measurements for device setting, in difficult cases EABR thresholds may be used as a starting point from which to estimate settings for the device.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:1093-1099)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology and the Ear Institute, University of Miami (Fla) (Drs Hodges and Balkany) and the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville (Drs Ruth and Lambert).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.