
Electrically Evoked Auditory Brain-Stem Response in Pediatric Patients With Cochlear Implants
Paul R. Kileny, PhD;
Teresa A. Zwolan, PhD;
Susan Zimmerman-Phillips, MS;
Steven A. Telian, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(10):1083-1090.
Abstract
 |  |
Objective To study the feasibility and clinical applicability of preoperative, transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response (EABR) in a pediatric patient population with cochlear implants.
Design A descriptive study using repeated measures analyses of variance to determine if EABR measures were affected by response configuration or cochlear status.
Setting The operating room before cochlear implant surgery.
Patients A population-based sample of 43 patients aged 2.5 to 14.5 years who were candidates for cochlear implantation.
Intervention Stimuli consisting of brief balanced biphasic current pulses were provided by a transtympanically placed promontory needle electrode; EABR was recorded with subdermal needle electrodes on the forehead and contralateral mastoid.
Main Outcome Measure Presence or absence of postoperative electrical excitability with a cochlear implant.
Results Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem responses were available from 41 of the 43 patients tested. Mean EABR threshold was 406.5 µA (SD=118.1) for 31 patients with patent cochleas and 472 µA (SD=91) for 10 patients with cochlear ossification. Mean wave V latency at threshold was 4.69 milliseconds (SD=0.57).
Conclusion Preoperative EABR is an integral component of the preoperative selection process for pediatric patients with cochlear implants.
(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:1083-1090)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Perceptual Consequences of Disrupted Auditory Nerve Activity
Zeng et al.
J. Neurophysiol. 2005;93:3050-3063.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Cochlear Malformations
Tucci et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:833-838.
ABSTRACT
|