You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 10, October 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Electrically Evoked Auditory Brain-Stem Response in Pediatric Patients With Cochlear Implants

Paul R. Kileny, PhD; Teresa A. Zwolan, PhD; Susan Zimmerman-Phillips, MS; Steven A. Telian, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(10):1083-1090.


Abstract

Objective
To study the feasibility and clinical applicability of preoperative, transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response (EABR) in a pediatric patient population with cochlear implants.

Design
A descriptive study using repeated measures analyses of variance to determine if EABR measures were affected by response configuration or cochlear status.

Setting
The operating room before cochlear implant surgery.

Patients
A population-based sample of 43 patients aged 2.5 to 14.5 years who were candidates for cochlear implantation.

Intervention
Stimuli consisting of brief balanced biphasic current pulses were provided by a transtympanically placed promontory needle electrode; EABR was recorded with subdermal needle electrodes on the forehead and contralateral mastoid.

Main Outcome Measure
Presence or absence of postoperative electrical excitability with a cochlear implant.

Results
Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem responses were available from 41 of the 43 patients tested. Mean EABR threshold was 406.5 µA (SD=118.1) for 31 patients with patent cochleas and 472 µA (SD=91) for 10 patients with cochlear ossification. Mean wave V latency at threshold was 4.69 milliseconds (SD=0.57).

Conclusion
Preoperative EABR is an integral component of the preoperative selection process for pediatric patients with cochlear implants.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:1083-1090)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perceptual Consequences of Disrupted Auditory Nerve Activity
Zeng et al.
J. Neurophysiol. 2005;93:3050-3063.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Cochlear Malformations
Tucci et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:833-838.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.