You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 10, October 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Point of View
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

'Appropriateness' of Tympanostomy Tubes

Setting the Record Straight

Charles D. Bluestone, MD; Jerome O. Klein, MD; George A. Gates, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(10):1051-1053.


Abstract

In a recent article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Kleinman and colleagues1 described their analysis of data on children who were insured by companies that used Value Health Sciences (VHS) for utilization review and who were proposed to have tympanostomy tube placement by their physicians. The analysis by employees of VHS determined that 27% of the procedures for tympanostomy tubes were "inappropriate" indications and 32% had "equivocal" indications; only 41% of the procedures had "appropriate" indications. As members of the expert panel who were invited by VHS to develop criteria for indications for tube insertion, we are not only concerned about many aspects of that publication, but also about the process that was used to arrive at the criteria, the aftermath of our involvement, and the potential implications these methods have on the future of delivery of health care in this country. The following is our attempt to describe the method, point out flaws in the process, and identify the obvious problems in the article by Kleinman and his colleagues, so that other physicians can benefit from our experience as participants in a utilization review by a for-profit company. To set the record straight, we present our current recommendation for tympanostomy tube insertion for the most frequently encountered conditions, recurrent acute otitis media and chronic otitis media with effusion, based on our analysis of results of randomized clinical trials.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh (Pa) School of Medicine and Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (Dr Bluestone); Boston (Mass) University School of Medicine, and Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Boston (Mass) City Hospital (Dr Klein); and Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington and Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center, Seattle, (Dr Gates).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ventilation Tube Placement in a Managed Care Population
Myer and France
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:226-228.
ABSTRACT  

Otitis Media
Morris
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:1434-1434.
ABSTRACT  

Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery
Niparko and Johns
JAMA 1995;273:1705-1706.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.