You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 1, January 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Results of Percutaneous Implants in the Temporal Bone

Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus, MD; Cor W. R. J. Cremers, MD, PhD; Ad F. M. Snik, PhD; Nico W. van den Berge, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(1):81-85.


Abstract

The bone-anchored hearing aid is an alternative to the conventional bone-conduction hearing aid, without the disadvantages of pressure pain or skin irritation and with direct sound transmission to the skull. The bone-anchored hearing aid is coupled to a percutaneous titanium implant, which is placed in the mastoid process in two surgical stages. We analyzed the clinical results of 68 percutaneous implants in 65 patients. After a follow-up period of 8 to 45 months, 97% of the implants were anchored in the bone. In 86% of the implants, no potentially dangerous skin reactions occurred. The occurrence of skin reactions was not time dependent. Movement of the skin, thick skin, and poor skin condition around the implant were related to the onset of skin reactions. This study showed that the percutaneous titanium implant forms a stable link between the bone-anchored hearing aid and the skull.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:81-85)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Nijmegen (the Netherlands) (Drs Mylanus, Cremers, and Snik); and the Diaconessenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (Dr van den Berge).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implant Location in Relation to Skin Reactions
Faber et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:742-747.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short- and Long-term Results With Implantable Transcutaneous and Percutaneous Bone-Conduction Devices
Snik et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:265-268.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hearing Aids: II. Implantable Hearing Aids
Gulya and Stach
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:363-367.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.