You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 6, June 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Treatment of Rhinophyma

'Cold' vs Laser Techniques

Gady Har-El, MD; Stanley M. Shapshay, MD; R. Kirk Bohigian, MD; Yosef P. Krespi, MD; Frank E. Lucente, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(6):628-631.


Abstract

• Objective.
—To compare laser surgery and sharp blade excision of rhinophyma.

Design.
—Retrospective study of 23 patients treated surgically for rhinophyma.

Setting.
—Four academic tertiary referral medical centers.

Participants.
—All 23 patients had moderate or major rhinophyma.

Intervention.
—Sixteen patients had laser surgery. Seven patients had sharp blade excision.

Outcome Measures.
—Length of the procedure, preservation of normal tissue, the need for skin grafting, intraoperative pain and discomfort, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain and discomfort, postoperative bleeding, complications, and end results (all listed in the literature as advantages of laser surgery).

Results.
—No difference in length of surgery, preservation of normal tissue, complications, postoperative pain, and end results. No need for skin grafting in both procedures. Less intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, easier and smoother procedure, and more comfortable postoperative care with laser surgery.

Conclusions.
—Our results do not agree with most of the list of advantages attributed to laser rhinophyma surgery in the literature.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:628-631)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn (Drs Har-EI and Lucente); St Lukes—Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY (Dr Krespi); and Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Mass (Drs Shapshay and Bohigian).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 11, 1992.

Presented at the Eastern and Canadian Sections Meeting of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New York, NY, January 11, 1992.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology, Long Island College Hospital, 340 Henry St, Brooklyn, NY 11201 (Dr Har-EI).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of a Dual-Mode Erbium:YAG Laser for the Surgical Correction of Rhinophyma
Fincher and Gladstone
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:267-271.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.