You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Experimental Mandibular Regrowth by Distraction Osteogenesis

Long-term Results

Maj Peter D. Costantino, MC, USAF; Craig D. Friedman, MD; Maise L. Shindo, MD; Col Glenn Houston, MC, USAF; George A. Sisson, Sr, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(5):511-516.


Abstract

• The use of gradual distraction to grow bone (distraction osteogenesis) has gained widespread orthopedic acceptance, but has only recently been applied to craniofacial skeletal defects. The use of bifocal distraction osteogenesis to fill experimental segmental mandibular defects with regenerate bone was recently reported. Though all canines in that study demonstrated normal oromandibular function, they were observed for only 4 weeks following defect closure. The study that is now reported describes the long-term (12-month) functional, morphologic, and biomechanical results when bifocal distraction osteogenesis was applied to the same model. In this long-term study, three canines had 2.5-cm unilateral segmental mandibular body defects filled with structurally stable bone using bifocal distraction osteogenesis. These dogs exhibited normal oromandibular function for 1 year following segment regrowth and external fixator removal. Macroscopic and histologic evaluation of the regrown segments revealed a re-formation of the cortical and medullary architecture. Stress testing demonstrated the average ultimate strength of the regrown segment at 53 MPa, which corresponded to 77%±5.7% of normal mandibular bone. The data suggest that clinical trials applying this technique to segmental mandibular reconstruction are warranted.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:511-516)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood (Dr Costantino), and Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago (Dr Sisson), Ill; Departments of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Costantino) and Oral Pathology (Dr Houston), Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Tex; Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Friedman); and Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles (Dr Shindo). None of the authors has any financial interest in Orthofix S.R.L., Verona, Italy.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 11, 1992.

Presented at the Surgical Forum of the 93rd Annual Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons, Chicago, III, October 22, 1991.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center (WHMC/SGHSO), Lackland AFB, TX 78236 (Dr Costantino).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Versatility of Distraction Osteogenesis in Craniofacial Surgery
Imola et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002;4:8-19.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Distraction Osteogenesis for Reconstruction of Mandibular Symphyseal Defects
Annino et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:911-916.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.