You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 3, March 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

External and Middle Ear Status Related to Evoked Otoacoustic Emission in Neonates

Kay W. Chang, MD; Betty R. Vohr, MD; Susan J. Norton, PhD; Mary D. Lekas, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(3):276-282.


Abstract

• Objective.
—Screening auditory status prior to neonatal hospital discharge to identify newborns with severe hearing impairment is an important pediatric care priority. Evoked otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing is a quick noninvasive method. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between external auditory canal and middle ear status with click-evoked OAE. It was hypothesized that vernix caseosa, debris in the ear canal, and middle ear fluid contribute to the OAE fail rate.

Design.
—All neonates had an initial OAE examination. A second investigator, "blinded" to the results, examined all ears otoscopically, cleaned any obstructing debris, and repeated with a second OAE test.

Setting.
—All neonates were tested in a designated nursery at a mean age of 43±21 hours.

Patients.
—Forty-one full-term neonates were prospectively enrolled.

Intervention.
—The ear canals with debris were cleaned under direct vision with a pediatric swab dampened by an alcohol wipe.

Outcome Measure
—The primary outcome measure was the postcleaning OAE pass rate.

Results.
—The preotoscopic examination pass rate of 82 ears was 76%. The OAE pass rate improved to 91% after debris removal.

Conclusions.
—The results indicate that the examination and cleaning of the external ear canal are important components of the neonatal screening process.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:276-282)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle (Drs Chang and Norton); the Department of Pediatrics, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (Dr Vohr), and the Department of Otolaryngology, Rhode Island Hospital (Dr Lekas), Providence.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 9, 1992.

Reprint requests to Women and Infants Hospital, 101 Dudley St, Providence, RI 02905 (Dr Vohr).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery
Johns and Richtsmeier
JAMA 1994;271:1698-1700.
ABSTRACT  

Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery
Johns and Niparko
JAMA 1993;270:243-245.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.