You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 12, December 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Free Tissue Transfer for Skull Base Reconstruction Analysis of Complications and a Classification Scheme for Defining Skull Base Defects

Mark L. Urken, MD; Peter J. Catalano, MD; Chandranath Sen, MD; Kalmon Post, MD; Neal Futran, MD, DMD; Hugh F. Biller, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(12):1318-1325.


Abstract

Objective
The role of free flaps in skull base reconstruction is discussed in detail. Twenty-six microvascular free tissue transfers performed in 22 patients are reviewed in detail. A classification scheme for skull base defects is presented.

Setting
Tertiary referral center.

Patients
Twenty-two patients with neoplasms that involve the skull base underwent a combined craniotomy and facial approach for resection. The resultant defects were reconstructed with a variety of microvascular free flaps.

Results
All 22 patients were ultimately successfully reconstructed with a free flap. One patient required a second free flap following ablative surgery for a recurrent tumor. The initial free flaps in three patients were unsuccessful and a second flap was required. The classification scheme was applied to all defects.

Conclusions
The creation of a functional separation of the intracranial and extracranial cavities can be extremely difficult to accomplish, especially when multiple cavities (nasal, oral, pharyngeal) are violated. Free flaps provide a solution to this problem in select cases. Skull base defects can and should be classified for the purpose of communication, treatment planning, prognosis of reconstruction, and judging therapeutic outcome.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:1318-1325)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Urken, Catalano, Post, Futran, and Biller) and Neurological Surgery (Dr Sen), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Microvascular reconstruction of cranial base defects: An evaluation of complication and survival rates to justify the use of this repair.
Newman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:381-384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Microvascular Free-Flap Reconstruction in the Head and Neck
Futran and Alsarraf
JAMA 2000;284:1761-1763.
FULL TEXT  

Microvascular Free Flap Reconstructive Options in Patients With Partial and Total Maxillectomy Defects
Triana et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:91-101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lateral Mandibular Reconstruction Using Soft-Tissue Free Flaps and Plates
Blackwell et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:672-678.
ABSTRACT  

Outcome and Complications of Extended Cranial-Base Resection Requiring Microvascular Free-Tissue Transfer
Clayman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:1253-1257.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.