You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 1, January 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hydroxyapatite in Experimental Laryngotracheal Reconstruction

Jean Michel Triglia, MD; Claudie Scheiner, MD; Jouanny Gouvernet, MD; Maurice Cannoni, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(1):87-91.


Abstract

• Current concepts in laryngotracheal reconstruction include lumen augmentation with interposition of autogenous costal cartilage. In an effort to reduce potential increased morbidity at the donor site, the use of porous hydroxyapatite was compared with autogenous costal cartilage in an experimental study. Ninety-nine New Zealand rabbits were randomly operated on to receive autogenous costal cartilage (n=32), hydroxyapatite covered by a perichondrium graft (n=33), or hydroxyapatite alone (n=34). Rabbits were killed at 3 months after the surgery. Clinically (n=85), no difference was found among the groups. Histologically (n=81), grafts (n=54) in the group receiving autogenous costal cartilage were greater than in those receiving the hydroxyapatite. Concerning the value of epithelial layer covering the graft, the rate of inflammation, the cricoid-graft interface, and the graft viability, no difference was noted among the groups. In the group in which no graft was found (n=27), a fibrous bridge maintaining a cricoid distraction was noted in 23 cases. This study shows the possible value of hydroxyapatite in the animal model, but before clinical application, the natural course of the fibrous bridge must be documented.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:87-91)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (Dr Triglia) and the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology (Drs Triglia and Cannoni), Histopathology (Dr Scheiner), and Biomathematics (Dr Gouvernet), Marseille (France) University Medical School. Presented in part at the First International Laryngotracheal Reconstruction Symposium, Cleveland, Ohio, August 25, 1991.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 3, 1992.

Reprint requests to Departement d'Otorhinolaryngologie, Hôpital de la Timone, Blvd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France (Dr Triglia).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tracheal Reconstruction: Mucosal Survival on Porous Titanium
Janssen et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:472-478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anterior and posterior cartilage graft dimensions in successful laryngotracheal reconstruction.
Koltai et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:631-634.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.