You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 1, January 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Combined Electrical and Acoustical Stimulation Using a Bimodal Prosthesis

Gary J. Dooley, PhD; Peter J. Blamey, PhD; Peter M. Seligman, PhD; Joseph I. Alcantara, DipAud; Graeme M. Clark, PhD; Jon K. Shallop, PhD; Patti Arndt, MA; James W. Heller, MSEE; Christine M. Menapace, MA

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(1):55-60.


Abstract

• A new device incorporating a cochlear implant speech processor and a speech-processing hearing aid for the unimplanted ear has been designed and tested with four severely hearing-impaired patients. The aim of the device is to provide a more acceptable and effective combination of electrical and acoustic signals to the two ears. When used monaurally, and binaurally in conjunction with the cochlear implant, the speech-processing hearing aid mean scores for open-set sentences, words, and consonants were as good as or better than the mean scores for the patients' own conventional hearing aids. Some patients improved much more than did others. Although not conclusive, these results are encouraging, especially as they were achieved with a laboratory prototype that did not allow the patients to become accustomed to the processor in everyday situations.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:55-60)



Author Affiliations

From the Human Communication Research Centre, Australian Bionic Ear and Hearing Research Institute, University of Melbourne (Australia) (Drs Dooley, Blamey, and Clark and Mr Alcantara); Cochlear Proprietary Ltd, Sydney, Australia (Dr Seligman); Denver (Colo) Ear Institute, (Dr Shallop); and the Cochlear Corp, Denver, Colo (Mr Heller and Mss Arndt and Menapace).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication September 15, 1992.

Presented, in part, at the Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Waikoloa, Hawaii, May 10, 1991.

Reprint requests to Human Communication Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Mollison House, East Melbourne 3002, Australia (Dr Dooley).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Binaural-Bimodal Fitting or Bilateral Implantation for Managing Severe to Profound Deafness: A Review
Ching et al.
TRENDS AMPLIF 2007;11:161-192.
ABSTRACT  

Adaptive Dynamic Range Optimization (ADRO): A Digital Amplification Strategy for Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants
Blamey
TRENDS AMPLIF 2005;9:77-98.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.