You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 5, May 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Disorders in the Community Hospital Setting

David B. Pitts, MD; Raymond L. Hilsinger, Jr, MD; Eugene Karandy, MD; Joel C. Ross, MD; James E. Caro, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118(5):479-482.


Abstract

• From 1983 to 1988, 47 patients with salivary gland disorders were assessed with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) before surgery. The preoperative fine-needle diagnoses were then compared with the postoperative pathologic findings. In the same period, 63 patients from two other community hospitals who had been evaluated preoperatively with FNA were studied retrospectively. The overall sensitivity of FNA for salivary neoplasms was 80.6%. Fine-needle aspiration was more sensitive in identifying benign tumors (88.4%) than malignant neoplasms (58.3%) and was least sensitive in identifying nonneoplastic salivary diseases (35.3%). Pleomorphic adenomas were correctly identified preoperatively in 96.2% of cases, whereas for malignant neoplasms, the diagnostic accuracy was highest for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (50%). To demonstrate the strengths of FNA as a diagnostic tool, as well as to delineate its limitations, we present our 5-year experience. Our FNA results are similar to those reported by the major European and American referral centers. Because our medical centers are community based, our results may more accurately reflect those seen by otolaryngologists in private practice. To date, no evidence of tumor seeding along the FNA tract has been reported.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:479-482)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers, Oakland, Calif (Drs Pitts, Hilsinger, and Caro) and San Francisco, Calif (Dr Karandy), and Brookside Hospital, San Pablo, Calif (Dr Ross). Dr Pitts is now with the Department of Otolaryngology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif; Dr Caro is now with the Department of Otolaryngology, Veterans Administration clinic, Oakland.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 17, 1991.

Presented at the Western Section Meeting of The Triological Society, Pebble Beach, Calif, January 7, 1990.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 4900 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90027 (Dr Pitts).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.