You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 4, April 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The External Rhinoplasty Approach for Rhinologic Surgery in Children

Peter J. Koltai, MD; James Hoehn, MD; C. Martin Bailey, BSCF, FRCS

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118(4):401-405.


Abstract

• The external rhinoplasty is a versatile approach for exposing nasal anatomy in children and has been utilized for a variety of rhinologic problems (N=35). These have included septal deviation (11), cleft lip nasal deformity (10), unilateral choanal atresia (five), nasal dermoids (four), and problems of the sphenoidal sinus (five). For children with septal deformities, the external approach allows complete intranasal visualization, providing access for careful and conservative reconstruction. In children with cleft lip nasal deformity, decortication allows for direct sculpting of the alar cartilages. For unilateral choanal atresia, the external technique provides exposure of the posterior vomer as in the transpalatal approach, but without the risk to palatal growth. For nasal dermoids, the open rhinoplasty offers wider exposure with more control over the medial osteotomies, a better view of the cribriform plate, and enhanced cosmesis. For problems of the sphenoid, the external route utilizes the guiding midline intranasal structures for rapid and direct entry into the sinus. In our study, the age range of the children was between 7 months and 18 years. The range of follow-up was between 6 months and 5 years. The techniques for the individual procedures are described, along with a rationale for their employment. There were no postoperative complications, and no long-term problems associated with the use of the external technique. In conclusion, the enhanced exposure provided by the external rhinoplasty approach in children facilitates rhinologic procedures on the soft tissues of the nose and the nasal architecture, as well as in the central core of the face.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:401-405)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Pediatric Otolaryngology (Dr Koltai) and the Division of Plastic Surgery (Dr Hoehn), Albany (NY) Medical College, and the Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London, England (Dr Bailey).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 18, 1991.

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Waikoloa, Hawaii, May 11, 1991.

Reprint requests to Section of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208 (Dr Koltai).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.