You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 9, September 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effective Head and Neck Tumor Markers

The Continuing Quest

Mary E. Ropka, PhD; W. Jarrard Goodwin, MD; Paul A. Levine, MD; Clarence T. Sasaki, MD; J. Cameron Kirchner, MD; Robert W. Cantrell, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(9):1011-1014.


Abstract

• To evaluate the clinical value of two serologic tumor markers, squamous cell carcinoma—associated antigen and plasma lipid—bound sialic acid, for identifying cancers of the head and neck, plasma specimens were obtained from patients receiving care for untreated newly diagnosed cancers of the head and neck, routine surveillance for recurrence, or treatment for chronic nonmalignant otolaryngologic conditions. Using identical methods at two institutions, levels of both markers were determined blind to diagnoses for patients with biopsyproven cancers of the head and neck (n=134) and for those defined as cancer free based on clinical evaluation for 6 months (n=140). Disease status was determined blind to tumor marker level results. Cancer prevalence was 48.9%. Applying standard normal limits used alone, plasma lipid—bound sialic acid test sensitivity was 63.4% and specificity was 77.9%. For squamous cell carcinoma—associated antigen alone, test sensitivity was 27.6% and specificity was 85.0%. Neither test alone appears sensitive enough to effectively detect early cancers of the head and neck. When the results of both tests in series combination were positive, sensitivity was 18.7% and specificity was 95.0%. If either was positive in parallel combination, sensitivity was 72.4% and specificity was 68.0%. Further evaluation is required that applies different definitions of normal and determines longitudinal changes with disease status.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:1011-1014)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (Drs Ropka, Levine, and Cantrell), and Division of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Drs Goodwin, Sasaki, and Kirchner). Dr Ropka is presently with the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; Dr Goodwin is presently with the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami (Fla) School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 13, 1991.

Presented at the Second International Conference on Head and Neck Cancer, Boston, Mass, August 4, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Box 430, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (Dr Levine).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cyfra 21-1: A New Potential Tumor Marker for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
Doweck et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:177-181.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.