You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 8, August 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Occult Surgical Glove Perforations in Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery

Michael S. Godin, MD; Carlos J. Lavernia, MD; Jeffrey P. Harris, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(8):910-913.


Abstract

• With the advent of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome crisis, it has become imperative that all surgeons minimize their risk of direct contact with the patient's body fluids. In the course of performing surgery, perforations are frequently created in surgical gloves, which often go unnoticed. This study determined the frequency with which occult glove perforations occurred in 134 consecutive head and neck surgical procedures. One thousand fifty gloves (650 gloves used in surgery, 400 unused control gloves) were analyzed for the presence of perforations large enough to permit the passage of fluid. An unrecognized glove perforation was detected in 25% of surgical cases. The duration of surgery correlated strongly and positively with the incidence of perforation. Perforation rates varied widely for specific types of procedures, and are reported for each of the five subdivisions within otolaryngology—head and neck surgery. The implications of these results are described, and recommendations for the use of protective measures, especially in reference to the use of double-gloving, are made.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:910-913)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Departments of Surgery (Drs Godin and Harris), and Orthopedic Surgery (Dr Lavernia), University of California at San Diego Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 15, 1991.

Presented at the 74th annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Oto-Ophthalmological Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 20, 1990.

Reprint requests to the Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California at San Diego Medical Center, H-895, 225 Dickinson St, San Diego, CA 92103 (Dr Godin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Unsuspected Glove Perforation During Ophthalmic Surgery
Miller and Apt
Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:186-193.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.