You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 8, August 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Facial Weakness

A Comparison of Clinical and Photographic Methods of Observation

I. M. Smith, BDS, FRCS(Edin); J. A. M. Murray, MD, FRCS(Edin), FRACS; R. E. Cull, BSc, PhD, FRCP(Edin); J. Slattery, MSc

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(8):906-909.


Abstract

• The search for an internationally acceptable facial grading system has resulted in an assessment of existing methods by several investigators. These studies were based on observations of video film taken of patients with varying degrees of facial malfunction. Although the grading systems were evaluated, the use of videotape has never been compared with clinical examination and its suitability for this type of work is, therefore, unknown. We used nine facial grading systems to compare the results of clinical observation with those of photographic methods of presentation. The latter included videotape, photographic slides, and a combination of the two. The correlation between clinical examination findings and findings of any of the photographic methods was poor, suggesting the need for a standard form of presentation when grading patients. The most consistent results were found with either clinical examination or photographic slides; videotape was the least reliable.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:906-909)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology, Bristol (England) Royal Infirmary (Dr Smith), and the Departments of Otolaryngology (Dr Murray), Medical Neurology (Dr Cull), and Medical Computing and Statistics (Mr Slattery), The Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, Scotland.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 6, 1991.

Reprint requests to the Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh EH3 9EN, Scotland (Dr Murray).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.