You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 8, August 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

The Prognostic Value of Endotracheal Tube-Air Leak Following Tracheal Surgery in Children

Allan B. Seid, MD; Michael S. Godin, MD; Seth M. Pransky, MD; Donald B. Kearns, MD; Bradley M. Peterson, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(8):880-882.


Abstract

• In an effort to determine if the endotracheal tube-leak pressure has prognostic value in relation to a successful outcome after one-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction or cricoid split surgery, a retrospective analysis was performed on 17 children who had undergone such surgery. The daily leak pressures, length of intubation, and ultimate outcome of attempts at extubation were noted. One hundred percent of patients with a leak pressure of less than 20 cm H2O on the day before extubation were successfully extubated. In contrast, the failure rate was 100% in children extubated with a leak of greater than 30 mm H2O. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant ({chi}2, 13.03). Sixty percent of patients with leak pressures in the range of 21 to 30 cm H2O were successfully extubated. The endotracheal tube-leak pressure is a parameter that has prognostic value, and should be considered in determining when to extubate children who have undergone tracheal reconstructive surgery.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:880-882)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology (Drs Seid, Pransky, and Kearns), and Critical Care Medicine (Dr Peterson), Children's Hospital and Health Center, San Diego, Calif; and Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of California at San Diego Medical Center (Dr Godin).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 2, 1991.

Presented at the fifth annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Toronto, Ontario, May 17, 1990.

Reprint requests to the Pediatric Otolaryngology Associates, 550 Washington St, Suite 621, San Diego, CA 92103 (Dr Seid).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Single-Stage Laryngotracheal Reconstruction: The Great Ormond Street Experience and Guidelines for Patient Selection
McQueen et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:320-322.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determination of Endotracheal Tube Size in Pediatric Patients
FERRARI and Cunningham
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:448-449.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.