You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 6, June 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Palpation of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis

Michiel W. M. van den Brekel, MD; Jonas A. Castelijns, MD, PhD; Gerard A. Croll, MD; Herbert V. Stel, MD, PhD; Jaap Valk, MD, PhD; Isaäk van der Waal, DD, PhD; Richard P. Golding, FRCR; Chris J. L. M. Meyer, MD, PhD; Gordon B. Snow, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(6):666-673.


Abstract

• In a series of 100 patients with head and neck carcinoma, the preoperative histopathologic findings of palpation and magnetic resonance imaging were compared with regard to both laterality and lymph node level (I through V). The overall error for palpation in detecting affected sides was 32%. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance images reliably upgraded 60% of the clinically negative necks, the overall error of magnetic resonance imaging being 16%. However, for both modalities, the sensitivity per level was too low to allow for selective neck dissections in case of only one positive level. These findings show that apart from primary tumor grading, magnetic resonance imaging can improve the preoperative grading of cervical lymph nodes. In selected cases, this may change the treatment plan to a "wait-and-see" policy or a more conservative type of neck dissection.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991; 117:666-673)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (Drs van den Brekel, Croll, and Snow), Radiology (Drs Castelijns, Valk, and Golding), Pathology (Drs Stel and Meyer), and Oral Pathology (Dr van der Waal), Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 26, 1990.

Reprint requests to Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Free University Hospital, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Dr van den Brekel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.