You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 5, May 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Functional Results After Total or Near Total Glossectomy With Laryngeal Preservation

Randal S. Weber, MD; Laurie Ohlms, MD; Julia Bowman, MA, CCC; Rhonda Jacob, DDS, MS; Helmuth Goepfert, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(5):512-515.


Abstract

• Locally advanced tongue cancer is a devastating disease for which there are limited therapeutic options that will result in a high rate of cure while preserving function. To determine the oncologic effectiveness of total or near total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation and the possibility of speech and swallowing rehabilitation following treatment, we reviewed our experience with 27 patients treated between 1982 and 1989. Twenty-four patients were eligible for 2-year follow-up and their disease-specific survival was 51%. Swallowing was achieved initially in 18 patients (67%), while 12 had successful long-term deglutition (44%). Oral communication was accomplished in 25 patients (92%). Significant aspiration occurred in three patients and was severe enough to require interval laryngectomy in two patients. The role of laryngeal suspension, palatal augmentation prosthesis, and videofluoroscopy as rehabilitation adjuncts for the total glossectomy patient are described.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1991; 117:512-515)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Weber, Ohlms, and Goepfert, and Ms Bowman) and Dental Oncology (Dr Jacob), The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 26, 1990.

Reprint requests to the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (Dr Weber).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Microvascular Flap Reconstruction of Major Pharyngeal Resections With the Intent of Laryngeal Preservation
Sumer et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:801-806.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Major Glossectomy in Dogs: A Case Series and Proposed Classification System
Dvorak et al.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 2004;40:331-337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fasciocutaneous Flap Reconstruction of the Tongue and Floor of Mouth: Outcomes and Techniques
Haughey et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1388-1395.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Total Glossectomy With Laryngeal Preservation
Tiwari et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:945-949.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.