You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 8, August 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Imaging Jugulotympanic Glomus Tumors

Peter David Phelps, MD, FRCS, FRCR; Anthony David Cheesman, FRCS

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(8):940-945.


Abstract

• Traditionally, jugulotympanic tumors, also called chemodectomas or paragangliomas, have been evaluated by conventional imaging to show bone erosion and angiography for the definitive diagnosis, location, and extent. More recently, computed tomography has been used to show these features as well as the intracranial extension. Magnetic resonance imaging has added a new dimension, particularly for assessment of intracranial spread and growth downward into the neck. We examined 20 jugulotympanic glomus tumors by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium enhancement and believe that these two imaging modalities, combined with clinical assessment, can provide all the necessary information regarding diagnosis, situation, and extent in the majority of jugulotympanic glomus tumors. Godolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was particularly effective for the detection of small tumors confined to the middle ear and for confirmation that the jugular bulb was not involved. Consequently, angiography is no longer a first-line imaging investigation but rather a preoperative evaluation only in those tumors in which preoperative embolization is required or occasionally when the extent of the tumor, especially in the jugular bulb, cannot be confidently predicted by noninvasive imaging.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:940-945)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Radiology, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London (Drs Phelps and Cheesman), and the Department of Radiology, Walsgrave Hospital, Coventry (Dr Phelps), England.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 27, 1990.

Reprint requests to Department of Radiology, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8DA, England (Dr Phelps).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Head and Neck Paragangliomas: Improved Tumor Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography As Compared with Fat-Suppressed MR Imaging Techniques
van den Berg et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004;25:863-870.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.