You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 8, August 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Esophagography and Esophagoscopy

Comparison in the Examination of Patients With Head and Neck Carcinoma

Matilde Nino-Murcia, MD; Miriam E. Vincent, MD; Charles Vaughan, MD; Willard E. Fee, Jr, MD; Richard L. Goode, MD; Alan H. Robbins, MD; F. Frank Zboralske, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(8):917-919.


Abstract

• We carried out a prospective, double-blind study at three institutions, comparing esophagography with esophagoscopy for the detection of simultaneous cancer of the esophagus in patients with other squamous cell cancers of the head and neck. The goal was to determine whether esophagography and esophagoscopy are necessary for the examination of patients before treatment. One hundred eighty-two patients were studied; both examinations were done in 148 patients. Twenty-one patients could not undergo esophagoscopy; esophagography was inadequate in 9 patients; 4 patients could have neither examination. Concordance was noted between the two procedures in 86.5% of patients. Sixty-five percent were normal, and 21.5% were abnormal. One esophageal cancer was found in this series that was diagnosed by both methods. Our data suggest that esophagoscopy and esophagography may be complementary in evaluating squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in patients before treatment. Esophagography alone was useful in patients in whom esophagoscopy could not be performed.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:917-919)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Drs Nino-Murcia and Zboralske), Division of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Fee and Goode), Stanford University School of Medicine and Palo Alto (Calif) Veterans Administration (VA) Medical Center; the Radiology Section Boston (Mass) VA Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Tufts University School of Medicine and Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Section, Boston VA Medical Center (Drs Vincent and Robins); and the Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University School of Medicine (Dr Vaughan).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 24, 1990.

Reprint requests to Diagnostic Radiology Service 114, VA Medical Center, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (Dr Nino-Murcia).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Simultaneous Esophageal Primary Tumors: Esophagoscopy vs Esophagography
Agrawal and Wenig
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:930-932.
FULL TEXT  

Esophagography and Esophagoscopy
TOOHILL and GROSSMAN
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:685-685.
ABSTRACT  

Esophagography and Esophagoscopy-Reply
NINO-MURCIA
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:685-685.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.