You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 4, April 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Patterns of Cervical Node Metastases From Squamous Carcinoma of the Larynx

Frank C. Candela, MD; Jayesh Shah, MD; David P. Jaques, MD; Jatin P. Shah, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(4):432-435.


Abstract

• We undertook a retrospective review of 247 previously untreated consecutive patients from 1965 to 1986 with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic or glottic larynx to ascertain the prevalence of neck node metastases by neck level. The 247 patients underwent a total of 262 radical neck dissections. Patients were grouped by clinical neck status at the time of neck dissection: elective dissection in the NO neck; immediate therapeutic dissection in the N+ neck; and subsequent therapeutic dissection in the NO neck that over time converted clinically to N+. Detailed analysis revealed a predominance of neck node metastases in levels II, III, and IV for all clinical neck groups. Level V was rarely involved, but always in conjunction with neck node metastases in levels II, III, or IV (ie, N2 disease). Level I was rarely involved; involvement occurred with neck node metastases in levels II, III, or IV 75% of the time. Level I involvement correlated with T3 or T4 primary tumors exhibiting histologic extralaryngeal spread. These data support the trend toward selective limited neck dissection in both NO and N1 patients.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:432-435)



Author Affiliations

From the Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 7, 1989.

Reprint requests to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (Dr Jatin P. Shah).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Critical Appraisal of Watchful Waiting Policy in the Management of NO Neck of Advanced Laryngeal Carcinoma
Yuen et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:742-745.
ABSTRACT  

Prognostic Factors in T3,N0-1 Glottic and Transglottic Carcinoma: A Multifactorial Study of 221 Cases Treated by Surgery or Radiotherapy
Kowalski et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:77-82.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.