You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 2, February 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Production of Monoclonal Antibodies to Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigens

Jasper J. Quak, MD, PhD; Fons J. M. Balm, MD, PhD; Joost G. P. Brakkee, BS; Rik J. Scheper, PhD; Chris J. L. M. Meijer, MD, PhD; Gordon B. Snow, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(2):181-185.


Abstract

• For therapeutic or diagnostic use of monoclonal antibodies in clinical oncology, high-affinity IgG antibodies to tumorassociated antigens have to be generated. In order to find out by what immunization schedule the chance to generate such antibodies is increased, we evaluated three different immunization protocols with and without attempts to induce tolerance to common tissue antigens. Mice were immunized either (1) by repeated intraperitoneal injections, (2) by a single intrasplenic injection, or (3) by an intraperitoneal injection followed by an intrasplenic booster. Whereas a single intrasplenic immunization resulted in low-affinity antibodies to tumor-associated antigen, high-affinity antibodies were generated with the other two protocols, although at a lower frequency. No benefit was seen from tolerance induction. The intraperitoneal/intrasplenic protocol was found to be superior over the other protocols because of minimal antigen dose and immunization time, as well as a higher frequency of hybridoma formation.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:181-185)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology—Head Neck Surgery (Drs Quak, Balm, and Snow, and Mr Brakkee), and Pathology (Drs Scheper and Meijer), Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 21, 1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology—Head Neck Surgery, Free University Hospital, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Dr Quak).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Optimal Quality 131I-Monoclonal Antibodies on High-Dose Labeling in a Large Reaction Volume and Temporarily Coating the Antibody with IODO-GEN
Visser et al.
JNM 2001;42:509-519.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Xenografts in Nude Mice by Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody E48
Quak et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:1287-1291.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.