You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computed Tomography of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes

A Clinical, Computed Tomographic, Pathologic Correlative Study

Pierre Moreau, MD; Yves Goffart, MD; Jacques Collignon, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(10):1190-1193.


Abstract

• A retrospective comparative study of 63 neck dissections was undertaken to evaluate further the accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) in the detection of nodal metastases, as previous studies have indicated a trend toward the superiority of CT scanning over palpation. The respective values of neck examination, CT scanning, and histopathologic examination were assessed in 51 patients with head and neck cancer who underwent a total of 63 neck dissections. The overall agreement between clinical examination findings and histopathologic findings was 92% vs 81% for CT scanning. A retrospective analysis of the CT findings failed to reveal greater accuracy. We found nodes measuring 10 mm or more with central low density always to be malignant. Because CT scanning seems to offer little advantage over palpation in the nonirradiated neck, it should not be regarded as an essential tool in the staging of nodal disease. After radiation therapy, as neck dissection is only performed because of clinical or radiologic suspicion, CT scanning is of utmost importance.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:1190-1193)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Moreau and Goffart) and Radiology (Dr Collignon), Liège (Belgium) University.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 29, 1990.

Read before the First European Congress of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Paris, France, September 28, 1988.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prospective Study on Neck Dissection after Primary Chemoradiation Therapy in Stage IV Pharyngeal Cancer
BREMKE et al.
Anticancer Res 2009;29:2645-2653.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analysis of Prognostic Variables among Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Late Chemo-Intensification Protocol: Impact of Nodal Density and Total Tumor Volume
Chufal et al.
Jpn J Clin Oncol 2006;36:537-546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Computed Tomographic Scans in the Management of the N-Positive Neck in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Chemoradiotherapy
Velazquez et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:74-77.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Selective Neck Dissection for Management of the Clinically Negative Neck
Pitman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:917-922.
ABSTRACT  

Detection of Cervical Metastasis: A Meta-analysis Comparing Computed Tomography With Physical Examination
Merritt et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:149-152.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.