You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 6, June 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Carboplatin

The Better Platinum in Head and Neck Cancer?

Peter Volling, MD; Michael Schröder, MD; Winrich Rauschning, MD; Wolf Achterrath; Eberhard Stennert, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(6):695-698.


Abstract

• Chemotherapeutic regimens containing cisplatin are the most effective ones in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Because of the high rate of dose-limiting side effects of cisplatin, carboplatin, a second-generation cisplatin analogue, was tested in a phase II trial with fluorouracil in 55 previously untreated patients with advanced carcinoma of the head and neck. Among the 52 patients who completed the study, there were 17 complete responses (33%), 28 partial responses (54%), five patients with no change (10%), and two with progressive disease (4%). Toxic side effects of all courses summed together included leukopenia in 65% of courses, thrombocytopenia in 45% of courses, nausea or vomiting in 29% of courses, and change in serum creatinine level in 3% of courses. These data were compared with the results of our study with cisplatin and fluorouracil in comparable patients and indicated that carboplatin and fluorouracil is better for induction chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer than cisplatin and fluorouracil due to similar effectiveness but less toxic effect.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:695-698)



Author Affiliations

From the HNO-Universitätskliniks, Cologne (Drs Volling and Stennert) and Göttingen (Dr Schröder), West Germany; Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Göttingen (Dr Rauschning); and Department of Clinical Research Anticancer, Bristol-Myers GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, West Germany (Mr Achterrath).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 4, 1988.

Read before the Second International Conference on Head and Neck Cancer, Boston, Aug 4, 1988.

Reprint requests to HNO-Universitätsklinik, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str 9, 5000 Köln 41, West Germany (Dr Volling).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Carboplatin-Radiation Interaction in Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines
Pekkola-Heino et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:1312-1315.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.