You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 5, May 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

T Staging of the Laryngohypopharyngeal Carcinoma

A 7-Year Multidisciplinary Experience

Sandro Sulfaro, MD; Luigi Barzan, MD; Francesco Querin, MD; Mario Lutman, MD; Giuseppe Caruso, MD; Roberto Comoretto, MD; Rachele Volpe, MD; Antonino Carbone, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(5):613-620.


Abstract

• Sixty-six whole-organ sectioned, nonirradiated, laryngopharyngectomy specimens that were removed because of cancer during a 7-year period were uniformly examined to determine the accuracy of pericperative T staging by high-resolution computed tomography (CT) and clinical evaluation (indirect-direct laryngoscopy) by comparing this preoperative staging with the postsurgical pathologic staging. The accuracy of the clinical vs CT staging for laryngeal carcinomas was 58.8% vs 70.6%, whereas the accuracy of the staging by combination of the two modalities was 88.2%. Combined staging modalities showed the same accuracy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas (88.2%), whereas clinical staging accuracy for hypopharyngeal carcinomas was lower (52.9%) and CT accuracy was higher (82.4%) than that observed for laryngeal carcinomas. In the majority of the cases that were staged inaccurately, the error was one of underestimation: in particular, tumors confined to the mucosa and early infiltration of laryngeal fat spaces were not detected by CT.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115:613-620)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Pathology (Drs Sulfaro, Volpe, and Carbone), Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy; and the associated Divisions of Otolaryngology (Drs Barzan, Caruso, and Comoretto) and Radiology (Drs Querin and Lutman), Pordenone (Italy) General Hospital.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 29, 1988.

Reprint requests to Division of Pathology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, via Pedemontana Occidentale, Aviano I-33081, Italy (Dr Carbone).

References 29, 34-36, 39-41, 43, 44, 47, 49.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Management and Outcome Differences in Supraglottic Cancer Between Ontario, Canada, and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Areas of the United States
Groome et al.
JCO 2003;21:496-505.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pretherapeutic Staging of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma: Clinical Findings, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Histopathologic Evaluation
Zbaren et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:908-913.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.