You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 3, March 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS FROM THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEAD AND NECK CANCER, BOSTON, JULY 31-AUGUST 5, 1988 Sponsored by the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tracheoesophageal Puncture for Voice Restoration After Extended Laryngopharyngectomy

Charles Juarbe, MD; Larry Shemen, MD; Robert Wang, MD; Vijay Anand, MD; Robert Eberle, MD; Ann Sirovatka, MS; Kathy Malanaphy, MA; Iris Klatsky, MA

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(3):356-359.


Abstract

• Tracheoesophageal puncture was performed in ten of our patients undergoing extended laryngopharyngectomy. Three fistulas were allowed to close, and two patients were dissatisfied with their results, which allowed for an overall 50% success rate in this subgroup. The resultant voice was objectively compared with similar groups of patients undergoing primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture after standard laryngectomy. There was no significant difference in maximum phonation time, average speaking intensity, and average fundamental frequency between these groups. However, the maximum intensity and average intensity were significantly lower for the flap group. Our results indicate that tracheoesophageal puncture should be attempted in patients undergoing the extended procedure, notwithstanding a lower expected success rate.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:356-359)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 4, 1988.

Read before the Second International Conference on Head and Neck Cancer, Boston, Aug 2, 1988.

Reprint requests to 1430 Second Ave, New York, NY 10021 (Dr Shemen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Functional Speech Outcomes After Laryngectomy and Pharyngolaryngectomy
McAuliffe et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:705-709.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparative Study of Speech After Total Laryngectomy and Total Laryngopharyngectomy
Mendelsohn et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:508-510.
ABSTRACT  

Tracheostoma Diverticulum Following Tracheoesophageal Puncture
Hoffman and Baker
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1074-1076.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.