You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clavicular Division Technique

A New Approach for Lengthening the Pectoralis Flap

M. Sean Freeman, MD; J. Regan Thomas, MD; Jeff A. Zipper, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(2):224-227.


Abstract

• Complications associated with using the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap increase significantly when a portion of the paddle is randomized and/or the flap is closed under tension. The clavicular division technique was devised to increase the length of the flap to help alleviate this problem. Thirty pectoralis major muscle flaps were dissected in fresh cadavers, using the clavicular division technique. The length of the flap after transposition was measured and recorded before and after clavicular division. The distance from the sternal notch to the clavicular division point was also recorded. The average gain in length was found to be 2.9 cm, with a range of 0.5 cm to 6.5 cm. The clavicular division technique has been used since in five patients. The increase in length has allowed us to discard some or all of the random portion of the flap. We advocate the use of this procedure on any patient where the surgeon is concerned about the viability of the random portion of the flap and/or when it is felt that the tension on the suture line is excessive.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:224-227)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis (Drs Freeman and Thomas), and Department of General Surgery, Cornell Medical Center, Great Neck, NY (Dr Zipper). Dr Freeman is now with Charlotte (NC) Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Associates.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 19, 1988.

Read before the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Palm Beach, Fla, April 30, 1988.

Reprint requests to Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Associates, 1600 E Third St, Charlotte, NC 28204-3282 (Dr Freeman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pectoralis Major Flap in Composite Lateral Skull Base Defect Reconstruction
Resto et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:490-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transclavicular Approach to the Neck, Thoracic Inlet, and Axilla
Papsin et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:984-987.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.