You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Histoacryl

Its Use in Aesthetic Facial Plastic Surgery

Frank M. Kamer, MD; John H. Joseph, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(2):193-197.


Abstract

• Since their discovery in 1949, cyanoacrylates have evoked interest as being a possible ideal "tissue glue." Several different forms of these compounds have been developed in order to try to reduce or eliminate tissue toxicity. Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl) appears to be the closest ideal material as it induces low tissue reactivity and toxicity. It has been used extensively for middle ear surgery with little or no adverse effects. A historical review of tissue adhesives and a discussion of technical considerations is outlined. A clinical trial of 100 patients treated with Histoacryl on various surgical wounds revealed no significant adverse effects with wound healing, graft rejection, or infection over a six-month period. Histoacryl appears to offer many advantages and few disadvantages over conventional suture techniques.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:193-197)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA Medical School.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 21, 1988.

Read before the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Palm Beach, Fla, April 22, 1988.

Reprint requests to 201 S Lasky Dr, Beverly Hills, CA 90212 (Dr Kamer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Prospective Comparison of Octyl Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive (Dermabond) and Suture for the Closure of Excisional Wounds in Children and Adolescents
Bernard et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1177-1180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Tissue Glue in Blepharoplasty: A Prospective Controlled Study of Wound-Healing Characteristics
Greene et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1:292-296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial Comparing Octylcyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive and Sutures in the Management of Lacerations
Quinn et al.
JAMA 1997;277:1527-1530.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of N-Octyl-Cyanoacrylate vs Suture in the Stabilization of Cartilage Grafts
Brown et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:873-877.
ABSTRACT  

Preexcision Blepharoplasty
Kamer and Mikaelian
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:995-999.
ABSTRACT  

Closure of Blepharoplasty Incisions With Autologous Fibrin Glue
Mandel
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:842-844.
ABSTRACT  

Histotoxicity of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives: A Comparative Study
Toriumi et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:546-550.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.