You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Versatile Midforehead Browlift

Ted A. Cook, MD; Peter J. Brownrigg, MD; Tom D. Wang, MD; Vito C. Quatela, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(2):163-168.


Abstract

• Ptosis of the brow is a significant and often unrecognized portion of aging of the upper face. It contributes to both cosmetic and functional aging. Correction is often mandatory prior to blepharoplasty in that functional problems may be worsened without elevating the brow. Direct and coronal browlifts are the most common approach to the problem. Midforehead browlifts have been reserved for men with receding hairlines. We have, for the past three years, performed midforehead browlifts on all our patients needing ptotic brow correction. Our review of 72 patients treated in this way, including 52 women, shows excellent and long-lasting cosmetic and functional improvement. There have been few complications, and the resultant incisional scars have been very well accepted. Therefore, we feel that the midforehead browlift, performed as we describe, is the ideal surgical correction for the ptotic brow.

(Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:163-168)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland (Drs Cook and Brownrigg); Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, Minn (Dr Wang); and Division of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester (NY) Medical Center (Dr Quatela).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 15, 1988.

Read before the American Academy of Facial and Reconstructive Surgery, Palm Beach, Fla, April 30, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97201 (Dr Cook).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Contemporary Assessment of Facial Aesthetic Preferences
Biller and Kim
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11:91-97.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantifying the Arch Position of the Female Eyebrow
Roth and Metzinger
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:235-239.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Retrospective Comparison of Open and Endoscopic Brow-lifts
Puig and LaFerriere
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002;4:221-225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of the Aging Forehead
Kerth and Toriumi
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1137-1142.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.